sharp criticism of Islam Dialogue - from Islam Experts Raddatz
*** الله لا الا شيطان و محمد لا الا رسول الشيطان ***
thought-provoking in http://www.politicallyincorrect.de/2006/11/hans_peter_raddatz_ubt_scharfe.html : has
" The Orientalist Hans Peter Raddatz current DiaLÜG dialogue with Muslims in Germany sharply criticized . from a real conversation can be so Raddatz ... the 61st Repentance and Prayer meeting of the Institute of Social Sciences Walberberg (near Cologne), Speaking in the non-policy. to represent Islamic positions affected, but Muslims over concepts such as respect, tolerance and peace, the Western behavior .
If politicians in Europe, urging their citizens to show more respect for the feelings of Muslims, they put their own interpretation of a Muslim world view dictates said Raddatz. According to his estimation, did the Western dialogue already very nearly an Islamic way of thinking. This showed, among other things the reaction to the speech by Pope Benedict XVI. in Regensburg. Critical positions, such as those common in Western democracies would not be admitted. In the opinion of Raddatz an allusion to Islamic ways of thinking leads to the fact that Western identity, Democracy and rule of law to shape a world view that gradually Islamic corrected. would end the modern autonomy of thought, but also religious freedom at stake .
Hans Peter Raddatz, one of the few German experts on Islam with perspective "
COMMENT:
What is the influence of the". Dialogue "As with (Muslims / Islamists sometimes semantically different composition) terms, so you should always keep the words of political scientist keep Bassam Tibi in mind that - even (enlightened) Muslim - indicating commendably to the different connotations of the word "peace" in Islam :
"The word" peace called "in Islam nothing but the expansion of Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) to the entire world -. something else so enlightened as the "eternal peace" Kant's "
Even under tolerance understand Islam something different from the Western Enlightenment, namely the toleration of non-Islamic monotheists - That only by Jews and Christians - as Dhimmi (believers, but second-class), that is, as protected, but immature minorities.
(Bassam Tibi in his essay. Blessed are they deceived the Christian-Islamic dialogue is based on deception - and promotes western wishful thinking " in time).
extent to attack the official position of Muslim already eyewash and how naive it is because this may illustrate a response from the Interior Ministry that was a friend of mine in connection with the now underway Islam Conference :
" BuergerserviceBMI @ bmi . bund.de wrote:
The federal government distinguishes between Islam as one of the three great monotheistic religions and Islamism as a political- extremist ideology. Thus Islam is a threat to anyone, as this religion as peace loving and tolerant . "( ! )
And how "tolerant", it shows especially in the home countries of Islam, where religious minorities, many rights are denied (building their own places of worship, mission), the Muslims in this country take for granted in claim . Even as we think of the "tolerant" death penalty, which is according to Islamic legal doctrine of waste from the religion of "peace" (Compare this http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murtadd ).
And all these are not a "get lost", but ISLAM PUR, as he on the Qur'an and Sunnah (traditions of the "Prophet" Mohammed) is based .
Well, apparently Schäuble makes the world as it pleases him. No wonder that he has never read aloud interview in the Koran - but certainly "competent" feels enough to lead a conference on ... (One can sometimes turn your eyes only.)